What to do when the results are insufficient: lessons from the excavation of a cairn field at Eikebakken, Øvre Øksnevad, Klepp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/ams-varia.vi61.336Keywords:
burial cairns, gravefields, sampling strategies, Øvre ØksnevadAbstract
The cairn field at Eikebakken, Øvre Øksnevad, Klepp municipality, Rogaland, Norway, was excavated over the course of 26 weeks in the summer of 2016. The site had undergone an initial survey in 2008, indicating a total of 79 cairns. However, when the site was uncovered a total of 103 stone built structures were identified, as well as three separate settlement areas and evidence of prehistoric farming. The initial project plan and budget were written with the idea of focusing on a smaller number of more thoroughly excavated (i.e. single-context) cairns. The increased number of structures made this plan untenable. As the excavation progressed it also became clear that the single-context method was not returning the amount of data required. The excavation thus went through several major shifts in strategy in response to, primarily, the archaeology and the need to develop a representative data set, but also time/budgetary constraints and available labor resources. The strategy ultimately settled upon involved a much more rapid excavation of a larger number of cairns with a focus on the use of environmental evidence from the cairns, particularly material suitable for radiocarbon dating, but also a range of other methodologies, as a means of understanding the development of the cairn field. This article will discuss both the methodologies and prioritizations involved in the excavation and will present some brief, initial results.
References
Bennett, A. (1987). Graven – religiös och social symbol. Theses and papers in North-European archaeology 18. Institute of Archaeology, Stockholm University.
Braathen, H. (1978). Øksnevadfunnet – en foreløpig melding. Frá haug ok heiðni 3, 79–81.
Boaretto, E. (2009). Dating materials in Good Archaeological Contexts: The Next Challenge for Radiocarbon Analysis. Radiocarbon 51:1, 275–281.
Dahl, B. (2016). Haugen som gravfelt. In W. Brun & E. S. Pedersen (Red.), Tverrfaglige perspektiver 3, 77–96. AmS-Varia 58. Museum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger,.
Dommasnes, L. H. (1997). Tradisjon og handling i førkristen vestnorsk gravskikk. I. Undersøkelser på et gravfelt på Vereide i Gloppen, Sogn og Fjordane. Arkeologiske rapporter 21, Arkeologisk Institutt, Museumsseksjonen Bergen Museum, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen.
Evis, L. H., Hanson, I. & Cheetham, P. N. (2016). An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: arbitrary level excavation and stratigraphic excavation. STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 2:2, 177‒191.
Fyllingen, H. (2008). Arkeologiske registreringer og forundersøkelser på Øvre Øksnevad, gnr. 8, bnr. 8, Klepp k., Rogaland. Oppdragsrapport B 2008/25. Arkeologisk Museum, Universitetet i Stavanger.
Gansum, T. (2004). Hauger som konstruksjoner – arkeologiske forventninger gjennom 200 år. Gotarc Series B. Gothernburg Archaeological Theses No. 33.
Helliesen, T. (1906). Oldtidslevninger i Stavanger amt. Klep sogn og pgd, Stavanger Museums Aarshefte 1905, 36–96.
Hemdorff, O. (1987). Langhus fra slutten av bronsealder – funnet på Håbakken i Klepp. Frá haug ok heiðni 3, 228–235.
Skauen, I. (1997). Utgraving av gravrøyser og bosetningsspor på Øksnevad, Klepp kommune. Frá haug ok heiðni 1, 39–42.
Wangen, V. (2009). Gravfeltet på Gunnarstorp i Sarpsborg, Østfold: et monument over dødsriter og kultutøvelse i yngre bronsealder og eldste jernalder. Norske Oldfunn XXVII/2009. Kulturhistorisk museum, Universitetet i Oslo.
