Continuities and differences in a Norwegian welfare service context
Comparing conversations about financial and employment problems in 1992 and 2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/2p5rss23Keywords:
institutional talk, welfare-to-work, social work, financial problems, comparative, footing, moral, controlAbstract
Welfare and social work aim for social justice and self-determination, and the work is sensitive to both its institutional context and to the worker-client relationship. In this article, we re-analyse and compare two sets of collected data (Oltedal, 2000; Olsen, 2022). The data consists of institutional talks between frontline workers and clients in a Norwegian welfare-to-work-service context; the social services (Sosialkontoret) in 1992, and an integrated labour- and welfare service (NAV) in 2015.The institutional framework of the two services shares many similarities, including the overall policy goal of securing people’s financial livelihood, as well as labour market inclusion. We investigate the following question: How is moral and control dealt with in institutional welfare conversations in Norway in both 1992 and 2015, related to clients’ financial and unemployment problems? The aim of the study is to explore changes in institutional talk by identifying and discussing contextual and relational-dependent similarities and differences.
The employment control aspect is more visible in 2015 data through social workers’ emphasis on a step-by-step approach wherein measures are reframed, while social workers in 1992 are more inclined to leave it up to clients themselves to make work-life connections. While the financial control aspect is more visible in 1992 through social workers’ emphasis on the client’s moral responsibility, this is less dominant in 2015, in which social workers are acting more neutral and descriptive. The institutional discourse has changed. In 1992, the framing of the talk between frontline workers and client has a stronger moral focus than in 2015. This is due to the animator footing (Goffman, 1981), where workers bring the context and the societal perspectives regarding norms for social welfare recipients into the discussion. In 2015, the principal footing (Goffman, 1981), where the possibility for the frontline worker to voice their own judgement is more visible and the framing of the talk is more relational-dependent. Changes can also be traced back to differences in welfare policy, where the financial issue is more in focus in 1992, while welfare-to-work is more on the frontline workers agenda in 2015.
References
Andreassen, T. A. & Aars, J. (2015). Den store reformen: Da NAV ble til. Universitetsforlaget.
Burns, T. (1992). Erving Goffman. Routledge.
Caswell, D., Eskelinen, L. & Olesen, S. (2013). Identity work and client resistance underneath the canopy of active employment policy. Qualitative Social Work, 12(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011413629
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge University Press.
Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J. & Gough, I. (1996). Social Assistance in OECD Countries, Vol. I: Synthesis Report. HMSO.
Ellingsæter, A. L., Hatland, A., Have, P. & Stjernø, S. (2020). Den nye velferdsstatens historie. Gyldendal.
Erlien, T. (2017). Sosialhjelp som internasjonalt forskningsfelt: Utfordringer og muligheter. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 20(3), 209-229. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2017-03-03
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge Polity Press.
Fellesorganisasjonen (2024). Yrkesetisk grunnlagsdokument for barnevernpedagoger, sosionomer, vernepleiere og velferdsvitere. Fellesorganisasjonen. https://brosjyrer.fo.no/wiki/yrkesetisk-grunnlagsdokument-bokmal/
Fredin, E. (1993). Dialogen i socialt arbete (SIC 36). University of Linköping.
Gjersøe, H. M., Leseth, A. B. & Vilhena, S. (2019). Frontline implementation of welfare conditionality in Norway: A maternalistic practice. Social Policy & Administration, 54(3), 491-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12567
Goffman, E. (1959). The Moral Career of the Mental Patient. Psychiatry, 22(2) 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1959.11023166
Goffman, E. (1974). Frames analysis. Northeastern University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Basil Blackwell.
Hansen, C. H. & Natland, S. (2017). The working relationship between social worker and service user in an activation policy context. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1221850
Hatland, A. & Pedersen, A. W. (2023). Velferdspolitikk. Gyldendal.
Healy, K. (2022). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Innjord, A. K. (2024). The user’s perspective: Rethinking the concept of work in the context of the Norwegian welfare state. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 19(2), 10-37. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i2.665
International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) (2014). Global definition of social work. IFSW. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
Janebová, R. & Truhlářová, Z. (2018). The concept of control from the perspective of the client's social work. Kontakt,20(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.009
Leseth, A. B., Vilhena, S. & Gjersøe, H. M. (2020). Aktivitetspliktens innside og utside. Unge mottakere av sosialhjelp og deres erfaringer med aktivitetsplikt. Tidskrift for velferdsforskning, 23(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.0809-2052-2020-02-04
Linnell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue (IMPACT: Studies in language and society, 3). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3
Luckman, T. (1992). On the communicative adjustment of perspectives, dialogue and communicative genres. In: A. H. Wold (Ed.), The Dialogical alternative (pp. 219-234). Scandinavian University Press.
Lødemel, I. (1997). Pisken i arbeidslinja. Om iverksetjinga av arbeid for sosialhjelp (Fafo-rapport 226). Fafo. https://www.fafo.no/en/publications/fafo-reports/pisken-i-arbeidslinja
Lødemel, I. (2001). National objectives and local implementation of workfare in Norway. In I. Lødemel & H. Trickey (Eds.), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in international perspective. The Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847425249
Lødemel, I. & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or Workfare? Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773589.001.0001
Messel, J. (2013). I velferdsstatens frontlinje. Universitetsforlaget.
Minas, R. (2014). One-stop shops: Increasing employability and overcoming welfare state fragmentation? International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(S1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12090
Olsen, G. (2022). Mulighetsrom i aktiveringsprosesser med unge: En studie av samtaler mellom Nav-veiledere og unge voksne i marginale arbeidsmarkedsposisjoner. University of Stavanger. https://doi.org/10.31265/USPS.234
Olsen, G. & Ellingsen, I.T. (2019). Arbeidsmarkedstiltak som læringsarena: Nav-veiledere og unge arbeidsledige om "læring i tiltak". Fontene forskning, 12(1), 30–42. https://fontene.no/forskning/navveiledere-og-unge-arbeidsledige-om-laring-i-tiltak-6.584.876741.c1ac1dc34e
Olsen, G. & Oltedal, S. (2020) The Use of a Client Feedback System in Activation Encounters. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(1) 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1769714
Oltedal, S. (2000). Praksis i sosialt arbeid. Ei studie av klientsamtalar på sosialkontor [Doctoral dissertation]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Oltedal, S. & Skippervik, L. J. B. (2022). Hjelpeprosessar og rettsbruk i Nav-kontor - om sosialt arbeid og juss i arbeids- og velferdstenesta. Fagbokforlaget
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method. University of California Press.
Shulman, L. (2016). Shifting the Social work Practice Paradigm: The Contribution of the Interactional Model. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1174645
Stjernø, S. & Hatland, A. (2020). Omorganisering og nye stønadsformer i arbeidslinjas tegn. In A. L. Ellingsæter, A. Hatland, P. Haave & S. Stjernø (Eds.), Den nye velferdsstatens historie: ekspansjon og omdanning etter 1966 (pp. 302-315). Gyldendal
Terum, L. I. (1996). Grenser for sosialpolitisk modernisering. Universitetsforlaget.
Turner, J. H. (1988). A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford University Press.
van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. & Larsen, F. (2017). Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694474
Zacka, B. (2017). When the State Meets the Street. Public Service and Moral Agency. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674981423
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siv Oltedal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.