Social workers understanding of extended families position in child welfare in Lithuania, Chile and Norway


  • Siv Oltedal
  • Ingunn Studsrød
  • Rasa Naujanienė
  • Carolina Muñoz Guzmán



child protection, cross-contextual research, extended family, family involvement


Child welfare services around the world deal with families and family complexities. The study from Chile, Lithuania and Norway explores how social workers define family and more specific the position of extended families within child welfare and thus indicate contextual differences and similarities. In the data collection, five focus groups were included: one Lithuanian (eight participants), two Chilean (with two and two participants) and two Norwegian groups (with seven and eight participants). The analysis reveals significant and thematic differences and similarities between the countries related to the fluid and varied concept of family. The results also show variations across contexts in which families that are targeted by the services, the involvement of children and nuclear and extended family members. A dilemma between children’s need to keep family bonds and the states responsibility to protect children, can be exemplified with the position of the extended family. We can identity a difference between Norway, with comprehensive state involvement that can be framed as they are dealing with a public family, and both Chile and Lithuania, which put more of an emphasis on problem-solving within families, and thus look at the family as more of a private sphere.

Author Biographies

Siv Oltedal

Department of Social Studies, University of Stavanger

Ingunn Studsrød

Department of social studies, University of Stavanger

Rasa Naujanienė

Assistant Professor
Social work department, Vytautas Magnus University

Carolina Muñoz Guzmán

Managing Director
Pontifica Universidad Catolica de Chile


Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Child custody (2019). Order on “Provision of child custody” of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. Updated November 20, 2019, No. 1173. Child protection in Lithuania. [Accessed 20.12.2019].

Children Act (1981). [Barnelova], Norway. [Barnelova –LOV-1981-04-08-7: Lov om barn og foreldre (1981)]

CRS (2020). file://fil03/emp01/2900817/Desktop/Litauen.pdf

CWA, Child Welfare Act (1992). Norway [Barnevernloven: LOV 1992-07-17-100: Lov om barneverntjenester (1992)]

Description of case management (2019). Order on “Approval of a case management procedure description” of Minister of Social Security and Labour of the Republic of Lithuania, December 30, 2019, No. A1-802.

Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65-84.

Forsberg, H., & Kröger, T. (2010). Social work within 'a welfare paradise'. In H. Forsberg & T. Kröger (Eds.), Social work and child welfare politics Through Nordic lenses (pp. 1-9). Bristol: The Policy Press.

Fox, H. L. (1997). Perspectives in Child Care Policy. London, UK: Longman Group.

Gale, C. (2016). Alternative Child Care and Deinstitutionalisation. A case study of Chile. CELCIS Centre for Excellence for looked after children in Scotland. Retrieved from

Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child Protection systems: International trends and comparisons, New York: Oxford University Press.

Havik. T., & Backe-Hansen, E. (1988). Kunnskapsstatus for fosterhjemsarbeidet [A status knowledge for foster care practice], Bergen: Nova.

Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Herrera, M., & Lathop, F. (2016). Parental responsibility: A comparative study of Latin American legislation, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 30, 274-291.

Jeldres, M., & Marchant, M. (2018). Ley de Adopción: Un proyecto que facilita quitarle los hijos a las familias marginadas [Law about adoption].

Kabasinskaite, D., & Bak, M. (2006). Lithuania’s children’s policy in the period of transition. International Journal of Social Welfare. 15, 247-256.

Kojan, B. H., & Fauske, H. (2011). Et klasseperspektiv på barnevernets familier. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 14(2), 95-109.

Law on the Fundamental Rights of the Child of the Republic of Lithuania (1996). Vilnius, March 14, (updated version since August 31, 2019).

Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 48-65.

Maclure, R. (2014). Introduction to children’s rights in Latin America: Constraints and possibilities. International Journal of Children’s Rights 2(22), 235-239.

Morgan, D. H. J. (2003). Introduction, In D. Cheal (Ed.), Family critical concepts in sociology (1-17). USA, Canada: Routledge.

Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections. Cambridge: Polity press.

Morris, T. (2006). Social work research methods: Four alternative paradigms Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Muñoz-Guzmán, C., Fisher, C., Chila, E., & LaBrenz, C. (2015). Child welfare in Chile: Learning from international experiences to improve family interventions, Social Sciences 4, 219-238,

Nikander, P. (2008). Working with Transcripts and Translated Data Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5:3,225—231.

NOU (2016: 16). New children act [Ny barnevernslov — Sikring av barnets rett til omsorg og beskyttelse] downloaded 9th of January 2020.

Nygren, K. Naujanienė, R., & Nygren, L. (2018). The notion of family in Lithuanian and Swedish Social Legislation. Social policy & society. 17(49), 651-663.

Nygren, L., & Oltedal, S. (2015). Constructing a vignette for qualitative comparative family research. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 10(1), 73 - 76.

Nygren, L. White, S., & Ellingsen, T. E. (2018). Investigating welfare regime typologies: Paradoxes, pitfalls and potentialities in comparative social work research. Social Policy & Society 17(4), 665-677,

Nygren, L. White, S., Ellingsen, T. E., & Christie, A. (2020). Gender, Parenting and practices in child welfare social work? A comparative study from England, Ireland, Norway and Sweden. The British Journal of Social Work 0, 1-18.

OECD (2018) Chile Febrero 2018: vision general. Estudios económocos de la OECD. Retrieved from

OECD (2020). How is life? 2020: Measuring well-being, Index Data, OECD Publishing, Paris

Oltedal, S., & Nygren, L. (2019). Private and public families: Social workers’ views on children’s and parents’ position in Chile, England, Lithuania and Norway. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 14(1), 115 - 140.

Palma, J., & Scott, J. (2020). The implications of changing living arrangements for intergenerational relations in Chile. Contemporary Social Science. 15(3), 392-405.

Quiroga, M. G., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. (2014). ‘In the name of the children’: Public policies for children in out-of-home care in Chile. Historical review, present situation and future challenges. Children and Youth Services Review. 44, 422-430

Skivenes, M. (2011). Norway: Toward a child-centric perspective. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child Protection systems: International trends and comparisons, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 154-183.

Statistics Norway (2018). Undersøkingssaker starta I løpet av året og avslutta av barnevernet, etter alder og kjønn. Fylke 1993-2017. [Accessed 20.1.2019].

Statistical Yearbook (2017). Vilnius. [Accessed 15.04.2019].

Studsrød, I., Ellingsen, I. T., Guzmán, C. M., & Espinoza, S. E. M. (2018). Conceptualizations of family and social work family practice in Chile, Mexico and Norway. Social Policy and Society.17(4), 637 – 649.

Taumutiene, I. (2018). Alcohol-related child maltreatment: Reports to the Child Right Protection in Kaunas Municipality. Nordic Studies on Alchohol and Drugs 35(1), 9-23.

Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57-87.

Walsh, J., White, S., Morris, K., & Doherty, P. (2018). How do you solve a problem like Maria? Family complexity and institutional complications in UK social work. European Journal of Social Work 22(6), 1050-1061




How to Cite

Oltedal, S., Studsrød, I., Naujanienė, R., & Guzmán, C. M. (2020). Social workers understanding of extended families position in child welfare in Lithuania, Chile and Norway. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 15(1), 84–107.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>