Bildung, capabilities, human freedom and human flourishing
impulses for social work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i1.727Keywords:
Bildung, capabilities, Germany, critical theory, social pedagogy, human growthAbstract
There is international interest in approaches to social work focussing on human development and service users’ real freedoms to act. One such example, established in social work, is the capabilities approach. This paper introduces a related, but internationally less well-known concept from German-language philosophy of education discourses, Bildung. It argues that Bildung represents a valuable additional framework for understanding social work in terms of human growth and human flourishing.
The concept of Bildung has taken many forms. The term’s changing notions are sketched, starting from its late enlightenment-period origins. Two particular variants are highlighted: the original 18th-century Bildung, which focussed on helping the individual reach a state of agency and Mündigkeit (maturity), a late 20th-century critical theory-influenced Bildung, which focussed on the relationship between the growth of the individual and the society of which they are part. A brief consideration of the capabilities approach provides a context for this discussion of Bildung, with parallels to the capabilities approach noted in the course of outlining Bildung theories. It is suggested that due to their shared tenets, both variants of Bildung can be seen a single concept, one with a strong conceptual closeness to the capabilities approach.
When applied to social work, Bildung suggests a shift away from thinking about the person in terms of utilities and outcomes, towards instead an understanding of a person’s humanness in their freedom to choose their own path and become the author of their own life. To conclude, consequences for a Bildung-informed social work are considered. Four are highlighted: the role of the social worker stimulating the service user’s dispositions in the context of their social environment; shifting to a relationship-oriented practice, centring on direct work; utilizing community settings in practice and the importance of refraining from using guidance, persuasion and coercion.
References
Adorno, T. W. (2003). Education after Auschwitz. (H. W. Pickford, Trans.) In T. W. Adorno, Can one live after Auschwitz? A philosophical reader. R. Tiedemann (Ed.) (pp. 19–33). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1966)
Adorno, T. W., Becker, H. (1999). Education for maturity and responsibility. History of the Human Sciences, 12(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526959922120324 (Original work published 1969)
Akhlaghi, F. (2022). Transformative experience and the right to revelatory autonomy. Analysis, 83(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anac084
Amezcua-Aguilar, T. & Espadas-Alcázar, M.Á. (2023). Epistemological breaks for social work training and practice: Participatory research through photovoice in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 24(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2022.2113370
Andersen, L. R. (2020). Bildung: Keep growing. Nordic Bildung.
Andresen, S., Otto, H. U. & Ziegler, H. (2010). Bildung as Human Development: An educational view on the Capabilities Approach. In H. U. Otto & H. Ziegler, (Eds.), Capabilities: Handlungsbefähigung und Verwirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 165–197). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91909-6_10
Banerjee, M. M. (2012). Comparing Rawlsian justice and the capabilities approach to justice from a spiritually sensitive social work perspective. Journal of Religion & Social Work: Social Thought, 31(1-2), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2012.647874
Barnes, B. (2000). Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible action. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219140
Belda-Miquel, S. (2022). Expanding well-being by participating in grassroots innovations: Using the capability approach to explore the interest of alternative food networks for community social services. British Journal of Social Work, 52(6), 3618-3638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab267
Bueb, B. (2006). Lob der Disziplin. Eine Streitschrift. List.
Bundesjugendkuratorium, Kommission für den Elften Kinder- und Jugendbericht & Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Kinder und Jugendhilfe (2002). Bildung ist mehr als Schule. Leipziger Thesen zu den Voraussetzungen für eine bildungspolitische Wende. Neue Praxis, 32(4), 317–320.
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) (Ed.). (2002). Elfter Kinder- und Jugendbericht. Bericht über die Lebenssituation junger Menschen und die Leistungen der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in Deutschland. BMFSFJ.
Carlson, J., Nguyen, H. & Reinardy, J. (2016). Social justice and the capabilities approach: seeking a global blueprint for the EPAS, Journal of Social Work Education, 52(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1174635
Cabiati, E. (2023). Open or closed doors? Accessibility of Italian social work organisations towards ethnic minorities. In E. J. Gómez-Ciriano, E. Cabiati & S. Dedotsi, (Eds.), Migration and Social Work (pp. 112–125). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2019.v8.1.003
Cleary, B. (2019). Reinterpreting Bildung in Social Pedagogy. International Journal of Social Pedagogy. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2019.v8.1.003
Den Braber, C. (2013). The introduction of the capability approach in social work across a neoliberal Europe. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory & Practice, 22(4), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.380
Dietrich, C., Krinninger, D. & Schubert, V. (2013). Einführung in die Ästhetische Bildung. (2nd ed.). Beltz Juventa.
Eisenstadt, N. (2011). Providing a sure start: How government discovered early childhood. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847427311
Evans, S. (2017). What should social welfare seek to achieve? Applying the capability approach. Ethics & Social Welfare, 11(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447342694
Ferguson, I. & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Policy Press.
Frampton, M. (2022). German social pedagogy and social work: The academic discourses mapping a changing historical relationship. International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 11(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ijsp.2022.v11.x.004
Frampton, M. (2024). The spirit of social pedagogy: The alternative theory base of German child welfare. Critical and Radical Social Work, 12(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021X16699797477718
Frampton, M., Arlinghaus, G. A., Hartogh, T., Schiller, U. & Parker, J. (2023). ‘The body and the ear’: An aesthetic education approach for the international social work classroom under Erasmus+ blended intensive programmes. Social Work Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2239833
Fraser, N. (2023). Cannibal capitalism. Verso.
Friesenhahn, G. J. (2014). Bildung. In G.J. Friesenhahn, D. Braun & R. Ningel (eds), Handlungsräume Sozialer Arbeit (pp. 65–75). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838585451
Friesenhahn, G. J. (2020). Sozialpädagogik und Bildung. In B. Birgmeier, E. Mührel & Winkler M. (eds.), Sozialpädagogische SeitenSprünge (pp. 79–88). Beltz Juventa.
Gahleitner, S. B. (2017). Soziale Arbeit als Beziehungsprofession: Bindung, Beziehung und Einbettung professionell ermöglichen. Beltz Juventa.
Gilbert, N., Parton, N. & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems. International trends and orientations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793358.001.0001
Glücks, S.C. & Ziegler, H. (2020). Wie geht’s weiter mit Capabilities Approach und Social Justice in der Sozialen Arbeit? Eine Hinführung. In Bielefelder Arbeitsgruppe 8 (Eds.), Wie geht’s weiter mit… Capabilities Approach und Social Justice …in der Sozialen Arbeit? (pp. 3–14). Verlag neue praxis.
Graf, G., Kapferer, E. & Sedmak, C. (2013). Der Capability Approach und seine Anwendung. Fähigkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen erkennen und fördern. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01272-4
Gupta, A. (2017). Learning from others: An autoethnographic exploration of children and families social work, poverty and the capability approach, Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015620946
Hellgermann, A. (2018). Kompetent. Flexibel. Angepasst. Zur Kritik neoliberaler Bildung. Edition ITP-Kompass.
Heydorn, H. J. (1979). Über den Widerspruch von Bildung und Herrschaft. Bildungstheoretische Schriften 2. Syndikat. (Original work published 1970)
Hopkirk, E. (1988). Introducing direct work with children to area teams in social services departments. In J. Aldgate & J. Simmonds (Eds.). Direct work with children: A guide for social work practitioners. Batsford Academic.
Horkheimer, M. (1953). Begriff der Bildung. Immatrikulationsrede Wintersemester 1952/53. In M. Horkheimer, Gegenwärtige Probleme der Universität. Frankfurter Universitätsreden, Heft 8, (pp. 14–23). Universitätsverlag.
Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung: A comparative cultural history. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814667
Hugman, R., Pawar, M., Anscombe, A. W. & Wheeler, A. (2021). Virtue ethics in social work practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003003151
Humboldt, W. von (2009). The Limits of State Action (J. W. Burrow, Trans.). J. W. Burrow (Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1792)
Humboldt, W. von (2000). Theory of Bildung (G. Horton-Krüger, Trans.). In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–61). Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1793)
Huss, E. & Sela-Amit, M. (2019). Art in Social Work: Do We Really Need It? Research on Social Work Practice, 29(6), 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517745995
Ibrahim, S. (2017). How to Build Collective Capabilities: The 3C-Model for Grassroots-Led Development. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 197–222, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1270918
IFSW (International Federation of Social Workers) and IASSW (International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
Jones M. & Pietilä I. (2020). Personal perspectives on patient and public involvement: Stories about becoming and being an expert by experience. Sociology of Health and Illness, 42(4), 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13064
Kant, I. (2009). An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’ (H.B. Nisbet, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1784)
Kjellberg, I. & Jansson, B. (2022). The capability approach in social work research: A scoping review of research addressing practical social work. International Social Work, 65(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819896849
Klafki, W. (1985). Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik. Breiträge zur kritisch-konstruktiven Didaktik. Beltz.
Klafki, W. (1990). Abschied von der Aufklärung? Grundzüge eines bildungstheoretischen Gegenentwurfs. In H. H. Krüger (Ed.). Abschied von der Aufklärung (pp. 91–104). Leske und Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-92644-9_6
Klafki W (2000) The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. (MacPherson R and Klafki W Trans.). In Westbury I, Hopmann S and Riquarts K (Eds.) Teaching as reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.85–107.
Klafki, W. (2007). Neue Studien zur Bildungstheorie und Didaktik: Zeitgemäße Allgemeinbildung und kritisch-konstruktive Didaktik. (6th ed.). Beltz.
Koselleck, R. (1990). Einleitung: Zur anthropologischen und semantischen Struktur von Bildung. In R. Koselleck (Ed.), Bildungsbürgertum im 19. Jahrhundert. Teil II. Bildungsgüter und Bildungswissen (pp. 11–46). Klett-Cotta.
Lawson, H. A. (2005). Empowering people, facilitating community development, and contributing to sustainable development: The social work of sport, exercise, and physical education programs. Sport, Education and Society, 10(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332052000308800
Lindström, J. & Rantanen, T. (2021). Experts of the streets: The thoughts of experts by experience with a history of crime and substance abuse on working as a team with professionals. European Journal of Probation, 13(3), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203211028250
Lorenz, W. (1994). Social work in a changing Europe. Routledge.
Löwisch, D. J. (1974). Erziehung und kritische Theorie: Kritische Pädagogik zwischen theoretischem Anspruch und gesellschaftlicher Realität. Kösel-Verlag.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation, In Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Meyer, M. A. & Meyer, H. (2007). Wolfgang Klafki. Eine Didaktik für das 21. Jahrhundert? Beltz.
Miethe, I. & Roth, S. (2016). Bildung und soziale Bewegungen – eine konzeptionelle Einführung. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 29(4), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2016-0262
Mollenhauer, K. (2016). Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing (N. Friesen, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1983)
Mührel, E., Niemeyer, C. & Werner, S. (Eds.) (2017). Capability Approach und Sozialpädagogik: Eine heilige Allianz? Beltz Juventa.
Natorp, P. (1974). Sozialpädagogik: Theorie der Willensbildung auf der Grundlage der Gemeinschaft (7th ed.). Ferdinand Schöningh. (Original work published 1899)
Nohl, H. (1982). Die pädagogische Bewegung in Deutschland und ihre Theorie (9th ed.). Verlag G. Schulte-Bulmke. (Original work published 1935)
Nussbaum, M. C. (2009). Creating capabilities: The human development approach and its implementation. Hypatia, 24(3), 211-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01053.x
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princetown University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Otto, H. U., Polutta, A. & Ziegler, H. (Eds.) (2009). Evidence-based practice: Modernising the knowledge base of social work? Barbara Budrich Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf08q1
Otto, H. U. & Rauschenbach, T. (Eds.) (2008). Die andere Seite der Bildung. Zum Verhältnis von formellen und informellen Bildungsprozessen (2nd ed.). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90972-1
Otto, H. U. & Ziegler, H. (2006). Capabilities and Education. Social Work & Society, 4(2), 269–287
Otto, H. U. & Ziegler, H. (Eds.) (2010). Capabilities: Handlungsbefähigung und Verwirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft (2nd ed.). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91909-6
Otto, H. U. & Ziegler, H. (2017). Soziale Arbeit, emanzipatorische Kritik und der Capabilities Ansatz. In E. Mührel, C. Niemeyer & S. Werner (Eds.), Capability Approach und Sozialpädagogik: Eine heilige Allianz? (pp. 235–255). Beltz Juventa.
Parker, J. (2023). Creative skills for social workers. In J. Parker (Ed.), Introducing Social Work (2nd ed., pp. 183–193). Sage
Parker, J. (2025). Social Work Practice. (7th ed.). Sage.
Preston-Shoot, M. (2007). Whose lives and whose learning? Whose narratives and whose writing? Taking the next research and literature steps with experts by experience. Evidence and Policy, 3(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426407781738056
Reynaert, D., Dijkstra, P., Knevel, J., Hartman, J., Tirions, M., Geraghty, C., Gradner, J., Lochtenberg, M. & van den Hoven, R. (2019). Human rights at the heart of the social work curriculum, Social Work Education, 38(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1554033
Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130.
Rogers, C. (1951). Client-Centred Therapy. Houghton-Mifflin.
Röh, D. (2013). Soziale Arbeit, Gerechtigkeit und das Gute Leben: Eine Handlungstheorie zur daseinsmächtigen Lebensführung. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19357-1
Saleeby, P. W. (2006). Applications of a Capability approach to disability and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in social work practice. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation. 6(1-2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1300/J198v06n01_12
Schiller, F. (2016). On the aesthetic education of man (K. Tribe, Trans.). Penguin. (Original work published 1795)
Sen, A. (1980). ‘Equality of What?’ In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Volume 1. (pp. 197–220). Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 30–53). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0003
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Slabbert, I. (2018). Applying the capability approach in social work education. Social Work Education, 37(7), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1458830
Spatscheck, C. (2019). Spatial approaches to social work: Theoretical foundations and implications for practice and research, European Journal of Social Work, 22(5), 845–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1550387
Störtländer, J. C. (2018). Bildung und Befähigung: Eine qualitative Studie zu kritisch-konstruktiver Didaktik und Capabilities Approach. Beltz Juventa.
Strømland, M. (2024). In your best interest: A study of how children have experienced being heard in child welfare services and how the Capability Approach could strengthen the understanding of the child’s best interests. University of Agder.
Suoninen, E., Jokinen, A. (2005). Persuasion in social work interviewing. Qualitative Social Work 4(4), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058647
Sünker, H. (1989). Bildung, Alltag und Subjektivität: Elemente zu einer Theorie der Sozialpädagogik. Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Sünker, H. (2003). Politik, Bildung und Soziale Gerechtigkeit: Perspektiven für eine demokratische Gesellschaft. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01834-9
Sünker, H. (2012). Soziale Arbeit und Bildung. In W. Thole (Ed.), Grundriss Soziale Arbeit, (pp. 249–266). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94311-4_11
Thiersch, H. (2008). Bildung und Soziale Arbeit. In H. U. Otto & T. Rauschenbach (Eds.), Die andere Seite der Bildung (pp. 237–252). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90972-1_18
Tröhler, D. (2003). The discourse of German Geisteswissenschaftliche Pädagogik: a contextual reconstruction. Paedagogica Historica, 39(6), 759–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923032000128890
Tucker, A. R. & Norton, C. L. (2013). The Use of Adventure Therapy Techniques by Clinical Social Workers: Implications for Practice and Training. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0411-4
Van Raemdonck, L & Seedat-Khan, M. (2018). A case study on a generalist service delivery model for street children in Durban, South Africa: Insights from the capability approach. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12418
Veal, D., King, J. & Marston, G. (2018). Enhancing the social dimension of development: Interconnecting the Capability Approach and applied knowledge for social workers, International Social Work, 61(4), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816651703
Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and reality. Tavistock.
Wirth, J. V. (2015). Die Lebensführung der Gesellschaft. Grundriss Einer Allgemeinen Theorie. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07707-5
Wronka, J. (2023). Human Rights and Social Justice (3rd ed.). Cognella.
Zitcer, A, Hawkins, J. & Vakharia, N. (2016). A capabilities approach to arts and culture? Theorizing community development in West Philadelphia. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1105284
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Magnus Frampton, Günter J. Friesenhahn, Jonathan Parker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.