Is it all about the money?
- a study of specialized frontline work in the Norwegian social assistance service
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i2.696Keywords:
Social assistance, Frontline work, NEETs, client-oriented work, Social Work, Norwegian Labour and Welfare AdministrationAbstract
This article is about meetings between frontline workers in the Norwegian labour and welfare administration (NAV), and young people outside work or school - NEETs. This group often has few or no financial rights beyond financial social assistance, which is granted from the social services in NAV. One of NAV's intentions is to ensure a work-oriented focus and comprehensive follow-up across various benefits. Based on a qualitative study in five NAV offices, the article investigates how organizational measures, in this case the specialization of work tasks, which seeks to put work-oriented aspects in the foreground of service provision, and separate it from traditional casework on benefit decisions.
The study consists of 14 observations of conversations between frontline workers and young social assistance recipients. Additionally, five focus group interviews were conducted with the frontline workers. The findings suggest that the frontline workers' follow-up appears fragmented, so that these young people can end up with up to three frontline workers at the same time, who are respectively responsible for finances, work and follow-up. This specialization can have implications for the quality of the service provision, and it seems that the nature and dynamics of social problems are not taken into account.
References
Alm Andreassen, T., & Aars, J. (2015). Den store reformen. Da Nav ble til [The Great Reform. When Nav came into being]. Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
Alm Andreassen, T., & Fossestøl, K. (2014). Utfordrende inkluderingspolitikk. Samstyring for omforming av institusjonell logikk i arbeidslivet, helsetjenesten og Nav [Challenging inclusion policy. Co-management for the transformation of institutional logic in working life, the health service and Nav. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning [Journal for social research], 55(2), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-291X-2014-02-02
Askim, J., Fimreite, A. L., Mosely, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2010). One Stop Shops: An Emerging Instrument for Joining up the 21st Century Welfare State. In: T. Christensen & A. L. Fimreite (Eds.), Nav in an international context (pp. 60-82). Uni Rokkan Centre.
Aust, A., & Arriba, A. (2005). Towards Activation? Social Assistance Reforms and Discourses. In: P. Taylor-Gooby (Ed.), Ideas and Welfare State Reform in Western Europe (pp. 100-123). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286016_6
Barak, A. (1989). Judicial Discretion. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt211qxt8
Barbier, J. C., & Mayerhofer, W. L. (2004). Introduction: The many worlds of activation. European Societies, 4(6),423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669042000275845
Berg, B., Ellingsen, I. T., Levin I., & Kleppe, L. C. (2019). Hva er sosialt arbeid? [What is social work?] In: I. T Ellingsen, I. Levin. B. Berg & L. C Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok [Social work. A Basic Book] (3rd ed., pp. 19-35). Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
Bernler,G., & Johnson, L. (2001). Teori för psykosocialt arbete [Theory for psychosocial work]. Natur & Kultur Akademisk.
Bradshaw, J., & Terum, L. I. (1997). How Nordic is the Nordic model? Social assistance in a comparative perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 6(7), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.1997.tb00001.x
Brodkin, E. (2011). Putting Street-Level Organizations First: New Directions for Social Policy and Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq094
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Commodification, Inclusion, and What? Workfare in Everyday Organizational Life. In: E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and The Welfare State (pp. 143-166). DJØF Publishing.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). The policies of Workfare: At the Boundaries between Work and the Welfare State. In: E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and The Welfare State (pp. 57-67). DJØF Publishing.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Street-Level Organizations and the Welfare State. In: E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and The Welfare State (pp. 17-34). DJØF Publishing.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Work and the Welfare State Reconsidered: Street-Level Organizations and the Global Workfare Project. In: E. Z. Brodkin & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and The Welfare State (pp. 271-181). DJØF Publishing.
Caswell, D., & Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015). Response from the frontline: How organizations and street-level bureaucrats deal with economic sanctions. European Journal of Social Security,17(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271501700102
Caswell, D., & Innjord, A. K. (2011). Inklusjonsorientert Nav-praksis? [Inclusion-oriented Nav practice?]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning [Journal for welfare research], 14(1), 38-51.
Caswell, D., Kupka, P., Larsen, F., & Van Berkel, R. (2017). The Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work in context. In: R. Van Berkel, D. Caswell, P. Kupka & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe. Activating the Unemployed (pp. 1-11). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694474-1
Chang, A. (2022). A formal model of street-level bureaucracy. Rationality and society, 34(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631211043205
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2016). The Routledge handbook to accountability and welfare state reforms in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612713
Cornell, K. L. (2006). Person-In-Situation: History, Theory, and New Directions for Social Work Practice. Praxis, 6, 50-57.
Cox, R. H. (1998). From safety net to trampoline: Labor market activation in the Netherlands and Denmark. International Journal of Policy and Administration, 4(11), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00079
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary Justice. University Press.
Djuve, A., & Kavli, C. (2006). Velferdsstatens skreddere. Skjønn og brukermedvirkning i flyktningetjenesten [The welfare state's tailors. Discretion and user participation in the refugee service]. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning [ Journal for Welfare Research], 9(4), 210–222.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.
llena, A. M., Marzana, E., & Pozzi, M. (2024). Strategies for Engaging and Outreaching NEETs in Italy: Insights from Active Labour Policies. Politics and Governance 12, Article 7499. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7499
Erlien, T. (2017). Sosialhjelp som internasjonalt forskningsfelt: Utfordringer og muligheter [Social assistance as an international field of research: Challenges and opportunities]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning [Journal for welfare research], 20(3), 209-229. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2017-03-03
Evans, T. (2010). Professional Discretion in Welfare Services. Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy. Routledge.
Evans, T. (2011). Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
Expert Group (2015). Et Nav med muligheter: Bedre brukermøter, større handlingsrom og tettere på arbeidsmarkedet: Gjennomgang av Nav, sluttrapport fra ekspertgruppen [A Nav with possibilities: Better user meetings, greater room for action and closer access to the labor market: Review of Nav, final report from the expert group]. Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet [Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nav-ekspertgruppens-sluttrapport-et-nav-med-muligheter/id2405035/
Fangen, K. (2004). Deltagende observasjon [Participatory observation] (2nd ed.). Fagbokforlaget [The trade book publishing house].
Fehrer, J. A., Baker, J. J., & Caroll, E. C. (2022). The role of public relations in shaping service ecosystems for social change. Journal of Service Management, 33(4/5), 614-633. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-01-2022-0044
Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Admin, 93(2), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
Freidson, E. (1994). Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy and Policy. Polity Press.
Fyhn, T., Radlick, R. L., & Sveinsdottir, V. (2021). Unge som står utenfor arbeid, opplæring og utdanning (NEET): En analyse av unge i NEET-kategorien [Young people who are out of work, training and education (NEET): An analysis of young people in the NEET category]. Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE). https://norceresearch.brage.unit.no/norceresearch-xmlui/handle/11250/2770190
Gjersøe, H. (2022). Providing help or restrictions?: Frontline workers’ understandings of behavioural conditionality for health-related social insurance and social assistance benefit in a joined-up governance context. European Journal of Social Work, 25(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934412
Gjersøe, H., & Leseth, A. B. (2022). Rettigheter, behov og plikter i aktivitetspolitikken: Forståelser av aktivitetsplikt for unge sosialhjelpsmottakere [Rights, needs and duties in the activity policy: Understandings of activity obligations for young social assistance recipients]. Kritisk Juss, 48(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.18261/kj.48.1.7
Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406824
Grimen, H. (2008). Profesjoner og kunnskap [Professions and knowledge]. In: A. Molander & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Professional studies] (4th is., pp. 71-85). Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
Hagelund, A., Øverbye, E., Hatland, A., & Terum, L. I. (2016). Sanksjoner – arbeidslinjas nattside? [Sanctions – the work line's night page?] Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning [Journal for welfare research] 19,(1) 24–43., https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2016-01-02
Halkier, B. (2010). Fokusgrupper [Focus groups]. Gyldendal.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography Principles in Practice. Tavistock Publication.
Heggebø, K., Bråthen, M., & Hermansen, Å. (2020). Deltakelse på arbeidsmarkedstiltak – hjelp til selvhjelp?: Helserelatert ulikhet i sysselsetting blant langtidsmottakere av økonomisk sosialhjelp [Participation in labour market schemes- help to self-help?: Health-related inequality in employment among long-term recipients of social assistance]. Søkelys på arbeidslivet [Spotlight on working life], 37(1-2), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2020-01-02-05
Heggebø, K., Dahl, E., & van der Well, K. A. (2020). Disentangling the dynamics of social assistance: A linked survey-Register data cohort study of long-term social assistance recipients in Norway. PlosOne,15(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230891
Helgøy, I., Kildal, N., & Nilssen, E. (2013). Utviklingen av en arbeidsrettet spesialistrolle i Nav [The development of a work-oriented specialist role in Nav]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning [Journal of welfare research] ,16(3), 141-156.
Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Refining Institutional Theory. In: W. W Powell & P. E DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organization analysis. (pp. 143-232). University of Chicago Press.
Jessen, J. T., & Tufte, P. A. (2014). Discretionary Decision-Making in a Changing Context of Activation Policies and Welfare Reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 4(2), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000998
Johannessen, A., Tufte, P. A., & Kristoffersen, L. (2009). Introduksjon til samfunnsvitenskapelig metode [Introduction to social science method] (3 ed.). Abstrakt forlag.
Jærvinen, M., & Mik-Meyer, N. (2003). At skabe en klient: institutionelle identiteter i socialt arbejde [Creating a client: Institutional identities in social work]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Jørgensen, H. (2008). Fra arbeidsmarkedspolitikk til beskæftigelsespolitikk – kosmetiske eller indholdsmessige forskelle? [From labor market policy to employment policy – cosmetic or substantive differences?] Tidsskrift for Arbeidsliv [Journal for Working Life], 10(3).
Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (2011). Developing Focus Group Research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208857
Kjørstad, M. (2005). Between professional ethics and bureaucratic rationality: The challenging ethical position of social workers who are faced with implementing a workfare police. European Journal of Social work, 8(4), 381-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450500314459
Kleppe, L. C. (2015). Making sense of the whole person: A multiple case study exploring the normative expectation of a holistic view of the service user [Doctoral dissertation, University in Oslo]. University of Oslo. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/50182
Kleppe, L. C. (2019). Sosialfaglig kompetanse [Social work competence]. In: I. T. Ellingsen, I, Levin, B. Berg & L. C Kleppe (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid. En grunnbok [Social work. A Basic Book] (3rd ed., pp.139- 153). Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
Krygier, M. (2012). Philip Selznick: Ideals in the world. Stanford Law Books. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804744751.001.0001
Levin, I. (2004). Hva er sosialt arbeid? [What is social work?]. Universitetsforlaget [The university publishing house].
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Saga Foundation.
Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2001). “An offer you can’t refuse”: Workfare in an international Perspective. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781847425249
May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(3), 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. University of Chicago Press.
Meld.St.32. (2020-2021). Ingen utenfor – En helhetlig politikk for å inkludere flere i arbeids- og samfunnsliv [No one outside - A comprehensive policy for to include more people in working and social life]. Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-32-20202021/id2856870/
Mik-Meyer, N., & Villardsen, K. (2012). Power and welfare: Understanding citizens' encounters with state welfare. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113370
Minas, R. (2014). One-stop shops: Increasing employability and overcoming welfare state fragmentation? International Journal of Social Welfare, 23(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12090
Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group guidebook. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328164
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Times Books.
Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité [The National Research Ethics Committee for Social Sciences and Humanities] (2023). Forskningsetiske retningslinjer for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora. Den nasjonale forskningsetiske komité for samfunnsvitenskap og humaniora (NESH) [The National Research Ethics Committee for Social Sciences and Humanities]. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/retningslinjer/hum-sam/forskningsetiske-retningslinjer-for-samfunnsvitenskap-og-humaniora/
Natland, S., & Hansen, H. C. (2014). Kompetanseutvikling hos veiledere i Kvalifiseringsprogrammet. [Competence development of supervisors in the Qualification Programme]. Fontene forskning, 7(2), 58-71 https://fontene.no/forskning/kompetanseutvikling-hos-veiledere-i-kvalifiseringsprogrammet-6.584.865436.9945ae1115
OECD (2018). Investing in Youth: Norway. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264283671-en
Ohls, C. (2020). Annengjøringens mekanismer og betydning - en studie av Kvalifiseringsprogrammet. [The mechanisms and significance of the othering - a study of the Qualification Program]. Fontene forskning, 12(2), 18- 31. https://fontene.no/forskning/annengjoringens-mekanismer-og-betydning-6.584.876724.c93994f7ab
Onwuegbuzie, A., Houston, S., Dickson, W. B., State, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Redmond, P., & McFadden, C. (2023). Young People Not in Employment, Education or Training (NEET): Concepts, Consequences and Policy Approaches. The Economic and Social Review, 54(4), 285-327.
Richmond, M. (1922). What is Social Case Work? An Introductory Description. Russel Sage Foundation.
Schaft, A., & Spjelkavik, Ø. (2012). Evaluering av kvalifiseringsprogrammet: Sluttrapport [Evaluation of the qualification program: Final report]. Arbeidsforskningsinstitutt [Labor Research Institute]. https://doi.org/10.7577/afi/rapport/2011:4
Senghaas, M., Freier, C., & Kupka, P. (2019). Practices of activation in frontline interactions: Coercion, persuasion, and the role of trust in activation policies in Germany. Social Policy Administration, 53(5), 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12443
Social Services Act (2009). Lov om sosiale tjenester i arbeids -og velferdsforvaltningen [Act on Social Services in the Labour and Welfare Administration] (LOV-2009-12-18-131). Lovdata. https://lovdata.no/sokq=lov+om+sosiale+tjenester+i+nav
Stepney, P. (2022). Foreword. In: N. Thompson (Ed.), Teaching social work (pp. 10-12). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stjernø, S., & Hatland, A. (2020). Omorganisering og nye stønadsreformer i arbeidslinjas tegn. [Reorganization and new benefit reforms in line with the work line]. In: A. L. Ellingsæter, A. Hatland, P. Have & S Stjernø (Eds.), Den nye velferdsstatens historie: Ekspansjon og omdanning etter 1966 [The history of the new welfare state: Expansion and transformation after 1966] (pp. 302-315). Gyldendal.
Strand, A. H., Backer, G. A., Grønningsæter, I., Nielsen, A. R., & Holte, J. H. (2020). Tid for aktivering: Evaluering av forsterket ungdomsinnsats i Nav [Time for activation: Evaluation of enhanced youth efforts in Nav] Institutt for Arbeidslivs-og velferdsforskning As. [Institute for Working Life and Welfare Research As.] https://www.fafo.no/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/tid-for-aktivering
Strand, A. H., Bråthen, M., & Grønningsæter, A. B. (2015). NAV-kontorenes oppfølging av unge brukere [The NAV offices' follow-up of young users] (FAFO-rapport). https://www.fafo.no/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/nav-kontorenes-oppfolging-av-unge-brukere
Strand, A. H., & Svalund, J. (2021). Velferdsordninger til unge: Bruk av arbeidsavklaringspenger og kvalifiseringsprogram blant unge utenfor arbeid og utdanning [Welfare schemes for young people: Use of employment verification money and qualification programs among young people outside of work and education]. Fafo. https://www.fafo.no/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/nav-kontorenes-oppfolging-av-unge-brukere
Terum, L. I., & Jessen, J. T. (2015). Den tvetydige aktiveringen: En studie av veiledere ved lokale Nav-kontor [The ambiguous activation: A study of supervisors at local Nav offices]. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning[Journal of Welfare Research], 18(2), 96-109.
Terum,L. I., & Sadeghi, T. (2019). Medarbeidernes kompetanse ved Nav-kontorene. Endringer i utdanningsbakgrunn, læring på arbeidsplassen og kompetanse, 2011-2018. [The employees’ competence at The Nav offices. Changes in educational background, workplace learning and competence, 2011-2018]. Oslo Metropolitan University.
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99-129). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4
Tjora, A. (2010). Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis [Qualitative research methods in practice] (4th ed.). Gyldendal.
Ulvik, M., Riesehanne, H., & Rones, D. (2016). Aksjonsforskning - et bidrag til en praksisnær og teoriorientert lærerutdanning [Action research - a contribution to practice-based and theory-oriented teacher education]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift [Norwegian educational journal], 100(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2987-2016-03-06
Van Berkel, R. (2017). The Street-Level Activation and the Unemployed Remote and Very Remote from the Labour Market: The Dutch Case. In: R. Van Berkel, D Caswell, P. Kupka & F. Larsen (Eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed (pp. 1-11). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694474-1
Van Berkel, R., & Borghi, V. (2008). Introduction: The Governance of Activation. Social Policy and Society, 7(3), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746408004302
Van der Wel, K., Hermansen, Å., Dahl, E., & Saltkjel, T. (2021). Utsatte unges livsbaner før og etter Nav reformen: flere «integrerte», sammenhengende, progressive og effektive forløp? [Welfare trajectories among vulnerable youth before and after the ‘Nav-reform’: Integrated, cohesive, progressive, and effective?]. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning [Journal for welfare research], 24(1), 62-84. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2021-01-06
Vilhena, S. (2020). Is it because you can’t, or don’t want to? The implementation of frontline sanctions in Norwegian social assistance. European Journal of Social Work ,24(3), 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1713052
Wendt, C. (2017). Introduction to Lepsius’ Concept of Institutional Theory. In: C. Wendt (Ed.), Max Weber and Institutional Theory (pp.1-22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44708-7_1
Ylvisaker, S., & Rugkåsa, M. (2021). Dilemmas and conflicting pressures in social work practice. European Journal of social work 25(4), 643-654 https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2021-01-06
Zacka, B. (2017). When the State Meets the Street. Public Services and Moral Agency. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674981423
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michaela Nilsen, Heidi Moen Gjersøe, Lise Cecilie Kleppe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.