Self-employment and disability

the case of support for starting a business in Sweden

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v18i2.658

Keywords:

Swedish Public Employment Service, disability, self-employment, entrepreneurship, institutional ethnography, support to start-up of a business

Abstract

In many countries, self-employment has become a common strategy for achieving inclusion in the labour market. Studies show that the occurrence of self-employment depends not only on individual motives, but also on existing policies and support. In Sweden, labour market measures to include people with disabilities are primarily organized to achieve inclusion through traditional forms of employment, though one tool offered by the Swedish Public Employment Service is Support to Start a Business. One part of this support is exclusive to people with disabilities. Although the Swedish Public Employment Service is responsible for this specific support, they collaborate with both external state-funded and non-profit actors who assess applicants’ business ideas.

Drawing on the methodological approach of institutional ethnography, this article explores how the in-house frontline workers and external actors describe their professional roles, how they make decisions and what the chain of action looks like at multiple sites. Nine representatives from the various organizations that people can meet with when trying to start and run their own business have taken part in semi-structured interviews.

The analysis identifies different institutional practices that overlap when people with disabilities apply for support to start their own business: one focusing on the efficient allocation of resources, and the other on the individual’s social and financial welfare by protecting the individuals these organizations meet with from risks connected to economy and health. These two practices reflect a long-standing conflict between control and support in objectives within both labour market policy and social work. This support of self-employment for people with disabilities is organized by actors who traditionally have not been studied in research on social work.

Author Biographies

Maria Norstedt

Senior lecturer
Department of Social Work, Malmö university
Sweden
E-mail: maria.norstedt@mau.se
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-8941

Per Germundsson

Associate Professor
Department of Social Work, Malmö university
Sweden
E-mail: per.germundsson@mau.se
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-4287

References

Andersson, E. & Mattsson, T. (Eds.) (2022). Teorier för socialt arbete Del 1 Strukturell ojämlikhet och samhällen i förändring [Theories for Social Work. Part 1 Structural Inequality and Societies in Change]. Gleerups.

Caldbick, S. Labonte, R. Mohindra, K. S. & Ruckert, A. (2014). Globalization and the rise of the precarious employment: The new frontier for workplace health promotion. Global Health Promotion, 21(2), 23-31. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1757975913514781.

DeVault, M. & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations”. In D.E. Smith (Ed.) Institutional Ethnography as Practice (pp. 15–44). Rowman & Littlefield.

European Commission (2010). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the Europe and economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0636&from=EN

Hultqvist, S. & Nørup, I. (2017). Consequences of activation policy targeting young adults with health-related problems in Sweden and Denmark, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, (25)2, 147–61. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982717X14940647262909

Jacobsson, K. & Hollertz, K. (2021). Commitment and control: Teamwork as management tool in a welfare state bureaucracy. Sociologisk Forskning [Sociological Research], 58(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/ 10.1332/175982717X14940647262909

Larsson, S. (2006). Disability Management and Entrepreneurship: Results from a Nationwide Study in Sweden. International Journal of Disability Management Research, 1(1),159–168. https://doi.org/10.1375/jdmr.1.1.159.

Lux, A. A., Macau, F. R. & Brown, K. A. (2020). Putting the entrepreneur back into entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, (26)5, 1011–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2020-0031.

Michailakis, D. & Schirmer, W. (2017). Systemiska perspektiv på socialt arbete [Systemic Perspectives on Social Work]. Studentlitteratur.

Nilsen, A. C. & Paulsen Breimo, J. (2023). Institusjonell etnografi [Institutional Ethnography]. Universitetforlaget.

Nord, T. (2018). Arbete som rättighet eller skyldighet. Föreställningar om arbetsmarknadsfrånvaro i välfärdsstaten [Work as a Duty or a Right: Ideas about labour market absence in the welfare state] [PhD thesis]. Karlstad University Studies.

Norstedt, M. & Germundsson, P. (2022). Self-Employment for People with Disabilities: Barriers to and (Im)possibilities in Starting and Running Their Own Business. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 24(1), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.909.

Norstedt, M. & Germundsson, P. (2023). Motives for entrepreneurship and establishing one’s own business among people with disabilities: Findings from a scoping review. Disability & Society, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09687599.2021.1919504.

OECD (2014). Policy Brief on Entrepreneurship for People with Disabilities Entrepreneurial Activities in Europe. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Policy-brief-entrepreneurship-people-disabilities.pdf.

Olofsson, J., Germundsson, P. & Norstedt, M. (2022) Företagare med funktionsnedsättning i Sverige – en ”bortglömd” grupp i gränslandet mellan arbetslinjen och funktionshinderspolitiken [Entrepreneurs with disabilities in Sweden – a “forgotten” group at the intersection between the work principle and disability policy]. Nordisk välfärdsforskning/Nordic Welfare Research, 7(2-4), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.7.2.3.

Olofsson, J. & Wadensjö, E. (2021). Den svenska arbetsmarknaden i går och i dag [The Swedish Labor Market Yesterday and Today]. Studentlitteratur.

Parker Harris, S., Caldwell, K. & Renko, M. (2014). Entrepreneurship by any other name: Self-sufficiency versus innovation. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 13(4), 317-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2014.961115.

Rankin, J. (2017). Conducting Analysis in Institutional Ethnography. Guidance and Cautions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917734472.

Rasmussen, S., Nätti, J., Larsen, T. P., Ilsøe, A. & Garde, A. H. (2019) Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work? Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(6), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9iS6.114689

Salonen, T. (2014). Socialt arbete och ekonomisk utsatthet i ett strukturellt samhällsperspektiv [Social Work and Economic Vulnerability in a Structural Societal Perspective]. In P. Lalander & B. Svensson (Eds.), Perspektiv på social utsatthet [Perspectives on Social Vulnerability] (pp. 25–50). Studentlitteratur.

SFS 2003:460. The Act concerning the Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans. https://www.onep.se/media/2348/the_ethical_review_act.pdf

Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira Press.

Statistics Sweden (2021). Situationen på arbetsmarknaden för personer med funktionsnedsättning 2020. [The Situation on the Labor Market for Persons with Disabilities 2020] https://www.scb.se/contentassets/cc3fe0436677446aae7b1ba19729c6a2/am0503_2021a01_br_am78br2101.pdf

Swedish Agency for Public Management (2010). Nytt stöd till egenföretagare? – En analys av stöd till personer med funktionsnedsättning som medför nedsatt arbetsförmåga. [New Support for Self-Employed People? – An Analysis of Support for People with Disabilities that Result in Reduced Workability]. http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/2010/201006.pdf

Swedish Disability Rights Federation (2021). Nödvändiga arbetsmarknadsreformer – funktionsrättsrörelsens 73-punktsprogram [Necessary Labor Market Reforms – the 73-point Program of the Disability Rights Movement]. https://funktionsratt.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Nodvandiga-reformer-Rorelsens-73-punktsprogram.pdf

Swedish National Audit Office/NAO (2019). Stöd till start av näringsverksamhet – långsiktiga effekter och Arbetsförmedlingens arbetssätt [Support for Starting a Business – Long-Term Effects and the Swedish Public Employment Service’s Working Methods]. RIR 2019:27. https://www.riksrevisionen.se/download/18.7a46d11f16db00d83eb2236/1604404973483/RiR%202019_27%20Anpassad.pdf.

Swedish Public Employment Service (2023a). Starta eget, stöd till start av näringsverksamhet [Start Your Own Business, Support for Starting a Business]. https://arbetsformedlingen.se/other-languages/english-engelska/extra-stod/stod-a-o/starta-eget-stod-till-start-av-naringsverksamhet

Swedish Public Employment Service (2023b). Bidrag till uppstartskostnader vid start av näringsverksamhet [Grant for Start-Up Costs when Starting a Business]. https://arbetsformedlingen.se/other-languages/english-engelska/extra-stod/stod-a-o/bidrag-till-uppstartskostnader-vid-start-av-naringsverksamhet

The National Board of Health and Welfare (2023). Ekonomiskt bistånd – för privatpersoner [Financial assistance – for private persons] https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/kunskapsstod-och-regler/omraden/ekonomiskt-bistand/ekonomiskt-bistand-for-privatpersoner/

United Nations (2008). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, article 27. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities

World Health Organization (2011). World Report on Disability. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Norstedt, M., & Germundsson, P. (2023). Self-employment and disability: the case of support for starting a business in Sweden. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 18(2), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v18i2.658

Issue

Section

Articles