Activation by technology
Young people’s use of digital tools provided by the government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i1.623Keywords:
digital government, digital divide, public administration, youth unemploymentAbstract
Modern welfare agencies are increasingly offering clients digital tools in their service delivery. Since young people are prolific users of digital technology, this trend should be to their advantage. However, the quantitative study presented in this article investigates how citizens under the age of 30 use public digital services, compared to those over 30. The study found that clients were less active than older clients in using a digital plan while receiving support from the government. Accordingly, they may be less able to receive help from public agencies when it is offered digitally. Yet, the choices made by caseworkers in how they prioritized clients for more personal support may have reduced the risk of this disadvantage.
References
Almaiah, M. A. & Nasereddin, Y. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 16(3), 236-259. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2020.108453
Asgarkhani, M. (2007). The Reality of Social Inclusion Through Digital Government. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(1-2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v25n01_09
Calzada, I. (2019). Technological sovereignty: Protecting citizens’ digital rights in the AI-driven and post-GDPR algorithmic and city-regional European realm. Calzada, I.(2019), Technological Sovereignty: Protecting Citizens’ Digital Rights in the AI-driven and post-GDPR Algorithmic and City-Regional European Realm, Regions eZine(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2018.00001038
Chan, C. (2018). ICT-supported social work interventions with youth: A critical review. Journal of Social Work, 18(4), 468-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316651997
Choi, M., Glassman, M. & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & education, 107, 100-112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.002
Digitaliseringsstyrelsen. (2016). Et stærkere og mere trygt digitalt samfund. https://digst.dk/media/12810/faellesoffentlige-digitaliseringsstrategi-2016-2020-dobbeltopsl.pdf
Digitaliseringsstyrelsen. (2019). Statusredegørelse 2019 for den fællesoffentlige digitaliseringsstrategi https://digst.dk/media/22101/ny-bilag-3-statusredegoerelse-2019.pdf
DiMaggio, P. & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/digital-divide-inequality-studying-internet-use/docview/1698963409/se-2.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C. & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). Russell Sage Foundation.
Dunleavy, P. (2016). Big data and policy learning. In G. Stoker & M. Evans (Eds.), Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences: methods that matter (pp. 143-151). The Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447329381-013
Ebbers, W. E., Jansen, M. G. & Van Deursen, A. J. (2016). Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108
European Commission. (2012). 2012 EU youth report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Eurostat. (2015). Being young in Europe today. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6776245/KS-05-14-031-EN-N.pdf
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fossestøl, K., Breit, E. & Borg, E. (2014). NAV-reformen 2014: En oppfølgingsstudie av lokalkontorenes organisering etter innholdsreformen. AFI. https://fagarkivet.oslomet.no/handle/20.500.12199/6228
Grødem, A. & Vilhena, S. (2019). Samhandling i frontlinjen på NAV-Kontoret [Frontline interaction at the NAV office]. In A.-H. Bay (Ed.), Trygd i aktiveringens tid (pp. 294-310). Gyldendal.
Grönlund, Å., Hatakka, M. & Ask, A. (2007, September 3-7). Inclusion in the e-service society–investigating administrative literacy requirements for using e-services. International Conference on Electronic Government, Regensburg, Germany.
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na (t) ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
Hargittai, E. & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication research, 35(5), 602-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
Howland, J. S. (1998). The ‘Digital Divide’: Are we becoming a world of technological ‘haves’ and ‘have‐nots?’. The Electronic Library, 16(5), 287-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045651
Hyggen, C. (2013). Unge i og utenfor arbeidsmarkedet i Norden. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 30(04), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-7989-2013-04-05
Jansen, A., Berger, J. B. & Goldkuhl, G. (2016). First choice, free choice or no choice-differences in secure digital post in the Scandinavian countries. In Electronic Government and Electronic Participation (pp. 135-143). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-670-5-135
Jones, L. M. & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New media & society, 18(9), 2063-2079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797
Kalstø, Å. M. (2022). Aktivitet og samhandling - Hvilken oppfølging får unge som kommer til NAV? Arbeid og velferd, 22(1), 35-58. https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/kunnskap/analyser-fra-nav/arbeid-og-velferd/arbeid-og-velferd/arbeid-og-velferd-nr.1-2022/aktivitet-og-samhandling-hvilken-oppfolging-far-unge-som-kommer-til-nav
Leung, T. T. (2011). Client participation in managing social work service—An unfinished quest. Social Work, 56(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.1.43
Lips, M. (2019). Digital Government: Managing Public Sector Reform in the Digital Era. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622408
Mandal, R., Dyrstad, K., Melby, L. & Midtgård, T. (2016). Omgjøring av vedtak i Nav og Trygderetten Sintef. https://www.sintef.no/publikasjoner/publikasjon/?pubid=CRIStin+1431110
Meriläinen, N., Pietilä, I. & Varsaluoma, J. (2018). Digital services and youth participation in processes of social change: World Café workshops in Finland. ECPR General Conference Universität Hamburg. https://researchportal.tuni.fi/en/publications/digital-services-and-youth-participation-in-processes-of-social-c
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. (2016). Meld. St. 33 (2015–2016). https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-33-20152016/id2501017/
Nissen, L. (2020). Social Work and the Future in a Post-Covid 19 World: A Foresight Lens and a Call to Action for the Profession. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(4), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2020.1796892
OECD. (2020). Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice. https://www.oecd.org/gov/fit-for-generations-global-youth-report-highlights.pdf
OECD. (2021). OECD's Youth Action Plan. https://www.oecd.org/employment/youth/The-Updated-OECD-Youth-Action-Plan.pdf
Olesen, E. S. (2018). Medbestemmelse og umyndiggørelse. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 21(04), 330-346. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2018-04-04
Peacock, A. (2019). Human rights and the digital divide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351046794
Radovic, A., DeMand, A. L., Gmelin, T., Stein, B. D. & Miller, E. (2017). SOVA: design of a stakeholder informed social media website for depressed adolescents and their parents. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(3), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1347552
Ragnedda, M. (2020). Traditional Digital Inequalities: Digital Divide. In: Enhancing Digital Equity (pp. 39-60). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49079-9_3
Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L. & Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring digital capital: An empirical investigation. New media & society, 22(5), 793-816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819869604
Ranchordas, S. (2021). Connected but Still Excluded? Digital Exclusion beyond Internet Access. In M. Ienca, O. Pollicino, L. Liguori, E. Stefanini & R. Andorno (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Life Sciences, Informative Technology and Human Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675360
Rivest, M.-P. & Moreau, N. (2015). Between emancipatory practice and disciplinary interventions: Empowerment and contemporary social normativity. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1855-1870. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu017
Russell, E., Lloyd-Houldey, A., Memon, A. & Yarker, J. (2018). Factors influencing uptake and use of a new health information app for young people. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 36(4), 222-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2018.1536911
Schuler, D. (2001). Digital cities and digital citizens. Kyoto Workshop on Digital Cities. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_6
Serrano‐Cinca, C., Muñoz‐Soro, J. & Brusca, I. (2018). A multivariate study of internet use and the digital divide. Social Science Quarterly, 99(4), 1409-1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12504
Skaarup, S. (2020). The Role of Domain-Skills in Bureaucratic Service Encounters. In G. Viale Pereira et al. (eds) Electronic Government 19th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2020, Linköping, Sweden, August 31 – September 2, 2020, Proceedings. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_14
Statistisk sentralbyrå. (2020). Aktiviteter utført på internett de siste 3 måneder (prosent), etter statistikkvariabel, kjønn, alder og år. https://www.ssb.no/statbahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_14nk/table/06998
Strand, A. H., Bråthen, M. & Grønningsæter, A. B. (2015). NAV-kontorenes oppfølging av unge brukere. Fafo. https://fafo.no/images/pub/2015/20446.pdf
Taiminen, H. & Saraniemi, S. (2018). Acceptance of online health services for self-help in the context of mental health: Understanding young adults’ experiences. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 36(2-3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2018.1426081
Terum, L. I. & Hatland, A. (2014). Sysselsetting og trygd under arbeidslinja. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 31(01-02), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-7989-2014-01-02-01
The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. (2019). Årsrapport 2018 https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/ccfdb1de77a04e41ad4989825a70e315/arsrapport_2018_arbeids_og_velferdsdirektoratet.pdf
Trischler, J. & Scott, D. R. (2016). Designing Public Services: The usefulness of three service design methods for identifying user experiences. Public Management Review, 18(5), 718-739. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1028017
Turner, B. S. (1990). Outline of a Theory of Citizenship. Sociology, 24(2), 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024002002
Van Deursen, A. J. & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In Communication and information technologies annual, (pp. 29-53). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
Van Deursen, A. J. & Van Dijk, J. A. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New media & society, 13(6), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
Van Deursen, A. J. & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New media & society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818797082
Van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
Van Dijk, J. A. (2013). A theory of the digital divide. In M. Ragnedda & G. W. Muschert (Eds.), The digital divide (pp. 49-72). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769-10
Van Parys, L. & Struyven, L. (2013). Withdrawal from the public employment serhttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069769-10vice by young unemployed: a matter of non-take-up or of non-compliance? How non-profit social work initiatives may inspire public services. European Journal of Social Work, 16(4), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.724387
Warren, M. (2007). The digital vicious cycle: Links between social disadvantage and digital exclusion in rural areas. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6-7), 374-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.04.001
Widlak, A. & Peeters, R. (2020). Administrative errors and the burden of correction and consequence: how information technology exacerbates the consequences of bureaucratic mistakes for citizens. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 12(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2020.106998
Zhang, T. (2016). Virker arbeidspraksis i ordinær virksomhet etter sitt formål? Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 33(01-02), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2016-01-02-03
Zhu, H. & Andersen, S. T. (2021). ICT-mediated social work practice and innovation: professionals’ experiences in the Norwegian Labour And Welfare Administration. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(4), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1740774
Aasback, A. W. (2022). Platform social work-a case study of a digital activity plan in the Norwegian Welfare and Labor Administration. Nordic Social Work Research, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2022.2045212
Åsheim, H. (2018). Aktivitetsplan som styringsverktøy. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 35(04), 242-258. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2018-04-01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Karl Kristian Larsson, Marit Haldar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.