Citizens’ experiences of enablers and barriers to obtaining digital citizenship
E-applications for social assistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v19i1.614Keywords:
self-service technology, e-applications, digital divide, social assistance, digital citizenship, SwedenAbstract
This article focuses on citizens’ experiences of enablers of- and barriers to obtaining digital citizenship. E-applications for social assistance are used as an exemplar. In Sweden, as in many countries, there is political pressure on welfare services to become more digitalized, and to offer different kinds of self-service technology such as e-applications. Even if the goals of implementing these technologies are to increase efficiency and transparency and offer faster services to citizens, there is a risk of expanding the ‘digital divide’. and making it more difficult to obtain one’s digital citizenship and gain access to social rights. This article draws on a qualitative interview study. and explores citizens’ experiences using e-applications in two Swedish municipal social assistance agencies. Results show that most citizens had positive experiences applying for social assistance online, but there were some potential barriers. There were also differences in experiences in the two municipal social assistance agencies. We discuss how the increased digitalization of welfare services seems to push towards a blend of digital and social rights. In this process, social workers play an important role in countering new types of inequalities that emerge in evolving social assistance organizations. The article identifies several areas that merit further research.
References
Baker, S., Warburton, J., Hodgkin, S. & Pascal, J. A. N. (2017). The supportive network: Rural disadvantaged older people and ICT. Ageing & Society, 37(6), 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000350
Bender, K., Schau, N., Begun, S., Haffejee, B., BarmanAdhikari, A. & Hathaway, J. (2015). Electronic case management with homeless youth. Evaluation and program planning, 50, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.02.002
Bernhard, I. & Wihlborg, E. (2021). Bringing all clients into the system–Professional digital discretion to enhance inclusion when services are automated. Information Polity, 27(3):373–389. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200268
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
Considine, M., McGann, M., Ball, S. & Nguyen, P. (2022). Can robots understand welfare? Exploring machine bureaucracies in welfare-to-work. Journal of Social Policy., 51(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000174
Gallist, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L. & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion—technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59(100973), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
Galperin, H., Bar, F. & Nguyen, H. (2021). The power divide: Mobile communication in Los Angeles’ skid row. Mobile Media & Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920932608
Germundsson, N. (2022). Promoting the digital future: the construction of digital automation in Swedish policy discourse on social assistance. Critical Policy Studies, 16(4), 478–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.2022507
Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W., Kattouw, R. & Dedding, C. (2019). ‘Just having a computer doesn’t make sense’: The digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socioeconomic position. New Media & Society, 21(11/12), 2347–2365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819846059
Hansen, H. T., Lundberg, K. & Syltevik, L. J. (2018). Digitalization, streetlevel bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283
Helsper, E. & Reisdorf, B. (2017). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676
Hintz, A., Dencik, L. & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital Citizenship in a datafied society. Polity Press.
Holmes, H. & Burgess, G. (2022). Digital exclusion and poverty in the UK: How structural inequality shapes experiences of getting online. Digital Geography, 3(100041), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100041
Manor, I. & Kampf, R. (2022). Digital nativity and digital diplomacy: Exploring conceptual differences between digital natives and digital immigrants. Global Policy, 13(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13095
Marshall, T.H. & Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and social class. Pluto Press.
Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero Muñoz, D., Raya Díez, E. & Castillo De Mesa, J. (2023). Digital inclusion for social inclusion. Case study on digital literacy. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1191995
Middle, R. & Welch, L. (2022). Experiences of digital exclusion and the impact on health in people living with severe mental illness. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1004547
Moreno, R. M., Borrero, M. F., Ferri Fuentevilla, E., Medina, F. R., Luchena, A. M. & Aguado, O. V. (2023). Technologies and social services. An overview of technology use by users of social services. PLoSONE, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284966
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship: The internet, society and participation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7428.001.0001
National Board of Health and Welfare (2021). Ekonomiskt bistånd: Handbok för socialtjänsten [Social assistance: Handbook for Social Services]. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/handbocker/2021-5-7389.pdf
Nordesjö, K., Ulmestig, R., & Scaramuzzino, G. (2023). Saving time for activation or relationships? The legitimation and performance of automated decision-making for time efficiency in two street-level bureaucracies serving poor and unemployed clients. Nordic Social Work Research, 14(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2023.2218385
Panican, A. & Ulmestig, R. (2016). Social rights in the shadow of poor relief–social assistance in the universal Swedish welfare state. Citizenship Studies, 20(3–4), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2016.1139053
Park, S. & Humphry, J. (2019). Exclusion by design: Intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 934–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606002
Ramsten, C., Hammar, L. M., Martin, L. & Göransson, K. (2017). ICT and intellectual disability: A survey of organizational support at the municipal level in Sweden. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(4), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12265
Raven, M. C., Kaplan, L. M., Rosenberg, M., Tieu, L., Guzman, D. & Kushel, M. (2018). Mobile phone, computer, and Internet use among older homeless adults: Results from the HOPE HOME cohort study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2196/10049
Salonen, T. (2013). Det nödvändiga uppbrottet: reformera det ekonomiska biståndet [The necessary break: reform social assistance] Stockholm Arena Idé.
Schou, J. & Pors, A. (2019). Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Social Policy & Administration, 53(3), 464477. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12470
Seong-Jae, M. (2010). From the digital divide to the democratic divide: Internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331680903109402
Silvennoinen, P. & Rantanen, T. (2023). Digital agency of vulnerable people as experienced by rehabilitation professionals. Technology in Society, 72(102173). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102173.
Simonofski, A., Clarinval, A., Vanderose, B., Dumas, B. & Snoeck, M. (2021). What influences citizens’ expectations towards digital government? An exploratory survey. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-12-2020-0173
Steyaert, J. & Gould, N. (2009). Social work and the changing face of the digital divide. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp022
Tomasello, F. (2023). From industrial to digital citizenship: rethinking social rights in cyberspace. Theory and Society, 52, 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09480-6
Wong, C. Y., Fung, C. Y. J., Law, K. C., Lam, Y. C. J. & Lee, P. W. V. (2009). Tackling the digital divide. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp026
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriella Scaramuzzino, Kettil Nordesjö, Rickard Ulmestig
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.