Public – private partnership

A critical discussion

Authors

  • Johans Tveit Sandvin
  • Frode Bjørgo
  • Gunn Strand Hutchinson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v6i2.59

Abstract

Public-private partnerships have long been highly valued in Western welfare states, and the valuation of such cooperation has become even stronger in light of last year’s economic turbulence, particularly with voluntary non-profit organizations (VNPOs). At the same time, the voluntary sector is changing. The broad popular movements have generally declined in favour of more individual interests as the basis for forming VNPOs, and those organisations still involved in the provision of social services are becoming more and more similar to public service, due to requirements placed on them by the public sector. This is believed to have consequences for the value of such cooperation. If voluntary organisations in public services – or other private organisations for the matter – are becoming copies of public services, there is not much value to be gained from such cooperation, except for some financial gain.In this article, we argue that this conclusion is based on a rather narrow perception of public-voluntary cooperation. Research and debate on such cooperation are mainly preoccupied by what we call supplementary relations, in which voluntary organizations are assessed according to whether they can deliver cheaper or better services than the public sector. Based on an example of public-voluntary cooperation in preventive social work among young adults in Norway, the article show that public-voluntary collaboration can be truly valuable when it is based on a complimentary relation, in which parties collaborate because they command different resources equally important to the task at hand.

Author Biographies

Johans Tveit Sandvin

Professor
University of Nordland
Norway
Johans.Sandvin@uin.no

Frode Bjørgo

Research fellow
University of Nordland
Norway
Frode.Bjorgo@uin.no

Gunn Strand Hutchinson

Assistant Professor
University of Nordland
Norway
Gunn.Strand.Hutchinson@uin.no

References

Andreassen, T. (2003). Behandling av ungdom i institusjoner. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.

Austin, M. J. (2003). The Changing Relationship between Nonprofit Organizations and Public Social Service Agencies in the Era of Welfare Reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32(1): 97-114.

Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Bennet, J. (1983). Classification of charitable purposes. In Charity Aid Foundation, Charity Statistics 1982/83, p. 77.

Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., & Dishion, T. J. (2006). “The Problem of Deviant Peer Influ- ences in Intervention Programs” pp. 3-14. In K. A. Dodge, J. E. Lansford, & T. J. Dishion (Eds.), Deviant Peer Influences in Programs for Youth. New York: Guilford Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Friberg, J. H. (2005). Ungdom, fritid og deltakelse i det flerkulturelle Oslo. Oslo: Fafo 2005:16.

Gray, A. (2002). Integrated Service Delivery and Regional Co-ordination: A Literature Review. Wellington: Gray Matter Research Ltd.

Guldbrandsen, T. & Ødegård, G. (2011). Frivillige organisasjoner i en ny tid. Utfordringer og endringsprosesser. Rapport. Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.

Henningsen, E. & Gotaas, N. (2008). Møter med ungdom i velferdsstatens frontlinje. Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning 2008:2.

Hutchinson, G. S., Sandvin, J. T., Bjørgo, F. & Johansen, P. O.(2011). Å lykkes i samarbeid mellom offentlige og frivillige organisasjoner. Upublisert artikkel.

Kelly, L. (2011). ‘Social inclusion’ through sports-based interventions? Critical Social Policy, 31(1): 126–150.

Klyve, A. & Pedersen, H. (1996). Oppsøkende sosialt arbeid i Norge før og nå: et historisk overblikk, med samfunnsmessige og geografiske sideblikk, In E. Børge (Ed.), Ute – inne. Oppsøkende sosialt arbeid med ungdom, pp. 22-45. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

Majumdar, D. (2006). Collaboration among government agencies with special reference to New Zealand: A literature review. Social Policy Review of New Zealand (27): March.

Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001). Collaboration: What Makes It Work? St Paul, Minnesota: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

NPQ (2008). Seizing the Day: Opportunity in the Wake of Crisis. An Interview with Lester Salamon. By editors. Nonprofit Quarterly, Winter 2008.

Osborne, S, P. (2002). Voluntary organizations and innovation in public services. London: Routledge.

Prefontaine, L., Ricard, L., Sicotte, H., Turcotte, D., & Dawes, S. (2000). New Models of Collaboration for Public Service Delivery. Working Paper prepared for CEFRIO: Worldwide Trends.

Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Salamon, L. M. & Anheier, H. K. (1994). The Emerging Sector. An Over-View. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.

Selle, P. (1998). Organisasjonssamfunnet – ein statsreiskap? In T. Grønli, & P. Selle(Eds.), Ein stat? Fristillingas fire ansikt. Oslo: Samlaget.

Sivesind, H. H. (2008). Halvveis til Soria Moria. Ikke-kommersielle velferdstjenester, politikkens blinde flekk? Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.

Symphony Magazine (2009). Reality Testing – An Interview with Lester M- Salamon. January 2009.

Downloads

Published

2011-10-03

How to Cite

Sandvin, J. T., Bjørgo, F., & Hutchinson, G. S. (2011). Public – private partnership: A critical discussion. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 6(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v6i2.59

Issue

Section

Articles