The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research
Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined?
This article refers to a study in Tanzania on fringe benefits or welfare via the work contract1 where we will work both quantitatively and qualitatively. My focus is on the vital issue of combining methods or methodologies. There has been mixed views on the uses of triangulation in researches. Some authors argue that triangulation is just for increasing the wider and deep understanding of the study phenomenon, while others have argued that triangulation is actually used to increase the study accuracy, in this case triangulation is one of the validity measures. Triangulation is defined as the use of multiple methods mainly qualitative and quantitative methods in studying the same phenomenon for the purpose of increasing study credibility. This implies that triangulation is the combination of two or more methodological approaches, theoretical perspectives, data sources, investigators and analysis methods to study the same phenomenon.However, using both qualitative and quantitative paradigms in the same study has resulted into debate from some researchers arguing that the two paradigms differ epistemologically and ontologically. Nevertheless, both paradigms are designed towards understanding about a particular subject area of interest and both of them have strengths and weaknesses. Thus, when combined there is a great possibility of neutralizing the flaws of one method and strengthening the benefits of the other for the better research results. Thus, to reap the benefits of two paradigms and minimizing the drawbacks of each, the combination of the two approaches have been advocated in this article. The quality of our studies on welfare to combat poverty is crucial, and especially when we want our conclusions to matter in practice.
Begley, C. M. (1996). Using triangulation in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 122-128.
Brannen, J. (1992). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: An Overview. Aldershot: Avebury.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bums, N., & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (2 ed.). Philadelphia: WB. Saunders.
Campbell, D., T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod
matrix. Psycho-Iogical Bulletin,, 56, 81-105.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. : Sage Production, Inc. USA.
Erzerberger, C., & Prein, G. (1997). Triangulation: Validity and empirically based hypothesis construction. Quality and Quantity, 31, 141-154.
Flick, U., Kardoff, E., & Steinske, I. (Eds.). (2004). A Companion to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Foss, C., & Ellefsen, B. (2002). The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(2), 242-248.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report. Ontario: University of Toronto. (N. S. University o. Document Number)
Hinds, P. S. (1989). Method triangulation to index change in clinical phenomena Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11(4), 440-447.
Hischheim, A. R. (1985). Information systems in Epistemology: An Historical Perspective. in Research methods in Information Systems. Munford. E; Hischheim, A.R et al; Eds, 13-38.
Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 24(No. 4, Qualitative Methodology).
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J. S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.
Knafl, K., Breitmayer, B., Gallo, A., & Zoeller, L. (1996). Family response to childhood chronic illness: Description of management styles. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children & Families, 11(5), 315-326.
Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. M. (Eds.). (2003). Mixed Methods Design: An Alternative Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mitchell, E. S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18-26.
Polit, D. E., & Hungler, B. P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods (6 ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Ryen, A., & Habi, R. (1994). Fringe Benefits in Tanzania: Three Case Studies. Morogoro: Instititute of Development management, Mzumbe. (M. IDM o. Document Number)
Shih, F.-J. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3), 631-641.
Smith, M. L., & Kleine, P. L. (1986). Qualitative research and evaluation: Triangulation and multimethods reconsidered In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation (New Directions for Program Evaluation). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spicer, N. (Ed.). (2004). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods (Second ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998 ). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thurmond, A. V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258.
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework.Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(4), 388-396.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Non-reactive research in the social sciences. . Chicago: Rand McNally.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.