Domesticating Technology in Pandemic Social Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v16i2.387Keywords:
Domestication theory, digital social work, pandemic, virtual interactionAbstract
On March 12th, 2020 the Norwegian government announced what later became known as ‘the lockdown’ of Norway due to the outbreak of Covid-19. This led to major changes in society where social distancing became the ‘new normal’ in everyday life. For social workers, it meant adapting to ‘new’ social problems among vulnerable groups as well as comprehensive changes in their working conditions and interactions with clients.
Many social workers communicated with clients on digital platforms before the pandemic, but Norway’s Covid-19 social distancing policies changed the terms for using these platforms. This article investigates the impact of the pandemic on the ways Norwegian social workers involve themselves with digital technology in their interactions with clients. We employ domestication theory to investigate how social workers shape and navigate these new circumstances triggered by the pandemic using a three-dimensional model that includes practical, symbolic, and cognitive levels of analysis.
The data underlying this article consist of 16 semi-structured interviews with social workers from seven different social services in Norway. The interviews were conducted approximately one month after the lockdown. The digital transformation within Norwegian social services, together with the changes related to the pandemic, have created new ways of practicing social work. We turn our attention to the following research questions: What characterized social workers’ digital interactions with clients during the first months of the pandemic? What can be learned from their experiences with domesticating technology? How has digital technology supported, challenged, and changed professional values in practice?
References
Ask, K., & Sørensen, K. H. (2019). Domesticating technology for shared success: Collective enactments of World of Warcraft. Information, Communication & Society, 22(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1355008
Barsky, A. E. (2017). Social work practice and technology: Ethical issues and policy responses. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1277906
Berker, T., Hartman, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K. (2006). Domestication of Media and Technology. McGraw-Hill Education.
Bufdir, The Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs (2020). Utsatte barn og unges tjenestetilbud under Covid-19 pandemien. Statusrapport 2. https://bufdir.no/Bibliotek/Dokumentside/?docId=BUF00005139
Bullock, A. N., & Colvin, A. D. (2015). Communication technology integration into social work practice. Advances in Social Work, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18060/18259
Cook, L. L., & Zschomler, D. (2020). Virtual home visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: Social Workers’ perspectives. Practice, 32(5), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2020.1836142
Datatilsynet, The Danish Data Protection Agency (2021). Transmission af personoplysninger via sms. https://www.datatilsynet.dk/emner/persondatasikkerhed/transmission-af-personoplysninger-via-sms
Granholm, C. P. (2016). Social work in digital transfer - blending services for the next generation [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi//bitstream/handle/10138/231820/GranholmSlutlig210316.pdf?sequence=1
Hammersley, V., Donaghy, E., Parker, R., McNeilly, H., Atherton, H., Bikker, A., & McKinstry, B. (2019). Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: A non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 69(686), e595-e604. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704573
Hill, K. M., & Ferguson, S. M. (2014). Web 2.0 in social work macro practice: Ethical considerations and questions. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 11(1).
Hill, A., & Shaw, I. (2011). Social Work and ICT. SAGE.
Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2012). ‘I did it my way’: Social workers as secondary designers of a client information system. Information processing management, 49(1), 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.05.003
LaMendola, W. (2019). Social work, social technologies, and sustainable community development. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(2-3), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2018.1552905
Lehtonen, T.-K. (2003). The Domestication of New Technologies as a Set of Trials. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3(3), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F14695405030033014
Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Making technology our own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget).
Maxwell, N., & Rees, A. (2019). Video Interaction Guidance: A return to traditional values and relationship-based practice? The British Journal of Social Work, 49(6), 1415-1433. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz067
Natland, S., Bjerke, E., & Torstenssen, T. B. (2019). ‘Jeg fikk blankpusset håpet om at jeg hadde en framtid’; opplevelser av god hjelp i møter med NAV. Fontene forskning, (1), 17-29.
NAV, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (2020). Hovedtall om arbeidsmarkedet 2020. https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/statistikk/arbeidssokere-og-stillinger-statistikk/relatert-informasjon/arkiv-hovedtall-om-arbeidsmarkedet-2020.
NRK, Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (2021). Kraftig økning i alvorlig vold mot barn. https://www.nrk.no/sorlandet/kraftig-okning-i-alvorlig-vold-mot-barn-1.15375187?fbclid=IwAR0pB6AvrvRvJ1Yw_FAMFlALJudFftPlPf-jf55GJweYWAtMAsMmAyGkw1w.
OECD (2017). Digital government review of Norway: Boosting the digital transformation of the public sector. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279742-en
Oestergaard, C. U., & Dinesen, B. (2019). Video communication as a tool for psychosocial support for people recovering from severe mental disorder: Social workers’ experiences. mHealth, (5), 38. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.09
Røhnebæk, M. (2014). Standardized flexibility: On the role of ICT in the Norwegian Employment and Welfare Services (NAV). Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.
Sovacool, B. K., & Hess, D. J. (2017). Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 703-750. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0306312717709363
Sørensen, K. H. (2004). Domestication: The social enactment of technology. Senter for teknologi og samfunn, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet (NTNU).
Tjora, A. (2017). Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis. Gyldendal akademisk.
Wyatt, S. M. (2003). Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the internet. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.). Now users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (p. 67-79). MIT Press.