Categories and orthodoxies in studies on culture and femicide

An ethno-informed route to knowledge

  • Anne Ryen
Keywords: femicide, culture, category-work, orthodoxies, ethnomethodology


This article is a methodological discussion, in which I argue that to study complex phenomena such as culture and femicide calls for other approaches other than the dominant interview and survey studies. By their focus on the contextual, the interactional and the process itself, and by rejecting language as referential and transparent, ethno-informed approaches better recognize and capture this complexity. To see the interview as a social interactional event grounded in a world of common-sense thinking makes members of a society share a common stock of knowledge, or a social world and communicative understanding. This is particularly relevant in cross-cultural studies, in which we can no longer assume that members share such common-sense thinking. This makes activities such as asking questions and filling answers into categories problematic. We need to see how a phenomenon such as femicide, telling stories about it and our representations reflect the diversity of cultural forms. I will draw on secondary data to illustrate my arguments and their relevance.

Author Biography

Anne Ryen

University of Agder
Department of sociology and social work
Servicebox 422
4604 Kristiansand S
+47 38141000


Abbas, M. (1988). Women and Vendettas. Peuples Méditerranéens, 44-45 Juil.- déc., 109-115. Retrieved from

Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., & Housley, W. (2008). Contours of Culture. Complex ethnography and the ethnography of the complexity. Walnut Creek: ALTAMIRA PRESS.

Banerji, R. (2008). Sex and Power: Defining History, Shaping Societies. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.

Banerji, R. (2013). Strategies to Tackle Femicides in India. In the ACUNS-report Femicide - A Global Issue that Demands Action (21-25). Vienna: The Academic Council on the United Nations System. Retrieved from:

Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W., & Francis. D. W. (1992). Perspectives in Sociology. London: Routledge.

Dagbladet (2012, September 21, 2012). Retrieved from

DeKeseredy, W. S. (2011). Violence against Women. Myths, Facts, Controversies. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2008). Separation/divorce sexual assault in rural Ohio: Survivors` perception. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36, 105-20.

Deleuze, D., & Guattari, G. (1983). On the Line. NY: Semiotexte.

Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge. NY: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.

Holen, Ø. (2018). Vold, dop og knuste hjerter. Rapperen Trippie Redd (18) og hans ansiktstattoverte likemenn forandrer popbransjen. D2, the weekly magazine of Dagens Næringsliv, 18, May 11, 9-16.

Incel (2018).

Jakobsen, H. Ø. (2013, August 28). Menn dreper familien. Retrieved 2018 from:

Lather, P. (2009). Against empathy, voice and authenticity. In A. Y. Jackson & L.A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in Qualitative Inquiry. Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 17-26). NY: Routledge.

Laurent, C., Platzer, M. & Idomir, M. (2013). Femicide - A Global Issue that Demands Action. Vienna: The Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS) Vienna Liaison Office. Retrieved from:

LaViolette, A. D., & Barnett, O. W. (2000). It could happen to anyone: Why battered women stay. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Louis, É. (2016). Histoire de la violence. Paris: Seuil.

Manjoo, R. (2013) cited p.14 in Stix-Hackl, C. (2013) Introductory Remarks. In the ACUNS-report Femicide - A Global Issue that Demands Action (14). Vienna: The Academic Council on the United Nations System. Retrieved from:

Marvasti, A. (2008). Interactional Constructionism. In J.A. Holstein, & J.F. Gubrium, (Eds.)Handbook of Constructionist Research. (pp. 315-330). NY: Guilford Press.

McEvilgy, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14, 91-103.

Messerschmidt, J. W. (2017). Masculinities and Femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review 13(3):70-79. Retrieved from

Miller, G., & Fox. K. (2004). Building bridges: The possibility of analytic dialogue between ethnography, conversational analysis and Foucault. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 35-55). London: Sage.

Native Women`s Association of Canada, (2008). Aboriginal Women in the Canadian criminal justice system. Oshweken, ON: Native Women`s Association of Canada.

Omar, S. (2017). Dødevaskeren [The corpse washer]. København: Politikens forlag. Retrieved from

O’Neill, M., Mansaray, S., & Haakaen, J. (2017). Women`s Lives, Well-Being, and Community. Arts-Based Biographical Methods. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(2), pp. 211-233.

Prior, L. (2011). Using Documents in Social Research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research (pp. 171-185). London: Sage.

Russel, D. (2013). “Femicide”—The Power of a Name. In the ACUNS-report (19-20) Femicide - A Global Issue that Demands Action (19-20). Vienna: The Academic Council on the United Nations System. Retrieved from:

Ryen, A. (2000). Colonial methodology? Methodological challenges to cross-cultural Projects collecting data by structured interview. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humphries (Eds.), Research and Inequality (pp. 220-235). London: University College London (UCL) Press

Ryen, A. (2008). Wading the Field with My Key Informant: Exploring Field Relations. Qualitative Sociology Review, 4(3), 84-104. Retrieved from

Ryen, A. (2012). Assessing the Risk of Being Interviewed. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research. Context & Method. (pp. 477-493). Thousand Oaks, US: Sage.

Ryen, A., & Silverman, D. (2000). Marking Boundaries: Culture as Category Work. Qualitative Inquiry. 6(1), 107-127.

Silverman, D. (2007). A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks. Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Smith, D. (1974). The social production of documentary realities. Sociological Inquiry, 44(4), 257-268.

Spivak, G. (1974). Translater`s preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. Pp. ix-xc.

Stamatel, J. P. (2014). Building concepts and definitions: A Practical proposal. Retrieved from:

Stavanger Aftenblad (2014, March 5). Retrieved from:

The European Science Foundation COST-Action IS-1206 on Femicide across Europe (2012-2017). Retrieved from: its four working groups. Retrieved from:

Vatnar, S.K.B. (2015). Partnerdrap i Norge 1990-2012 En mixed methods studie av risikofaktorer for partnerdrap. OUS (Oslo Universitetssykehus), Kompetansesenter for sikkerhets-, fengsels- og rettspsykiatri for Helseregion Sør-Øst. Retrieved from:

vom Lehn, D. (2014). The Creation and Development of Ethnomethodology. Walnut Creek, Ca.: Left Coats Press.

Websdale, N. (1998). Rural women battering in the justice system: An ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Weil, S. (2017). The Advantages of Qualitative Research into Femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review 13(3):118-125. Retrieved from

Weil, S., & and Kouta, C. (2017) Researching Femicide from a Qualitative Perspective. Special Issue of Qualitative Sociology Review, 13 (3) Retrieved from:

Wilkinson, S. (2011) Analysing Focus Group Data. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative Research. (pp.168-184). London: Sage.

Yanow, D. (2014/15). Accounting for “Natives” and Strangers: The Work of Metaphors andCategories. Migration and Citizenship. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Migration and Citizenship. 1(3), pp.15-22.

Yardley, E., Wilson, D., & Lynes, A. (2013). A Taxonomy of Male British Family Annihilators, 1980–2012. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. Retrieved from:
How to Cite
Ryen, A. (2018). Categories and orthodoxies in studies on culture and femicide: An ethno-informed route to knowledge. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 13(1), 124 - 143.
  • Abstract 436
  • PDF 512